The Resilient Innovations Private Limited (“BharatPe”) controversy, involving its co-founder Ashneer Grover (“Grover”), has captivated India's business and startup community. BharatPe started as a successful fintech venture, however it spiralled into a public and legal dispute, including allegations of financial misconduct, governance challenges, and a courtroom battle over the ownership and transfer of shares. At the heart of the matter was Grover’s dramatic exit from BharatPe and his subsequent legal entanglement with BharatPe and co-founder Shashvat Nakrani (“Nakrani”) over allegations inter alia of fraud and embezzlement.
1. Founding of BharatPe and Early Success (2018-2021)
BharatPe was co-founded by Grover and Nakrani in 2018, quickly establishing the company as a key player in India’s fintech ecosystem. The company’s innovative approach to UPI-based merchant payments and its focus on small business credit solutions helped it achieve unicorn status by 2021. Grover, as the public face of BharatPe, became widely recognized for his leadership and his appearances on the Indian edition of Shark Tank.
However, as the company expanded, internal governance and financial oversight issues began to surface.
2. The Beginning of the Controversy (January 2022)
In January 2022, an audio clip allegedly featuring Grover verbally abusing a Kotak Mahindra Bank’s employee emerged. Although Grover denied the clip's authenticity, this incident triggered an internal audit by BharatPe’s board (“Board”) to investigate potential financial irregularities. This audit served as a key legal starting point as it exposed issues related to the misuse of company funds and improper invoicing.
3. Termination of Madhuri Jain Grover (February 2022)
BharatPe terminated Madhuri Jain Grover (“Madhuri”), Grover’s wife and head of controls of BharatPe, in February 2022, based on findings from the internal audit. Allegations included financial misappropriation, such as inflated vendor payments, forged invoices, and irregular expenses. This became a pivotal moment, as the termination notice sparked the beginning of the broader legal conflict between the Grover family and BharatPe.
4. Ashneer Grover’s Resignation and Share Dispute (March 2022)
In March 2022, amidst the escalating tension and the audit’s findings, Grover resigned from BharatPe. Post his exit, the focus shifted to the treatment of Grover’s equity stake in BharatPe, which amounted to around 9.5% of the company’s shares.
Grover accused the Board and its investors of orchestrating his removal and attempting to dilute or seize his shares without just cause. The Board, on the other hand, considered legal action to reclaim Grover’s shares, citing the results of the financial audit and possible clawback provisions in shareholders’ agreements.
5. The Share Transfer Dispute: Nakrani vs. Grover (March 2023)
While Grover’s battle with the Board simmered, a related legal dispute emerged when Nakrani filed a case in the Delhi High Court over the transfer of shares to Grover. Nakrani alleged that Grover had failed to pay the consideration for 2,447 equity shares of BharatPe, which were transferred to Grover in 2018 under an oral agreement.
Nakrani issued a 'Rescission and Termination Notice' in March 2023, claiming that the share transfer should be cancelled due to non-payment. He relied on the Sale of Goods Act, 1930, arguing that the title to the shares never legally passed to Grover because the payment condition was never met.
Grover, in his defence, argued that the consideration was paid in cash at the time of the transfer, and that Form SH-4, the official share transfer form, had been duly executed, listing him as the legal owner of the shares.
(a) Court’s Observations and Judgment on Form SH-4 (2023)
The Delhi High Court delivered its judgment on the case in 2023, focusing heavily on the validity of Form SH-4, which plays a crucial role in the transfer of shares. The court noted the following:
(i) Form SH-4 was duly signed by both Nakrani and Grover, and it explicitly mentioned that the consideration for the shares had been received by Nakrani. This undermined Nakrani’s claims that the payment had not been made.
(ii) The court found that Nakrani’s argument of non-receipt of consideration was in direct contradiction to the statements made in Form SH-4, where it was expressly recorded that the transaction had been completed with the necessary payment.
(iii) Register of Members: The court also pointed to the register of members of BharatPe, which listed Ashneer Grover as a shareholder since 2018 for the transferred shares, further reinforcing the validity of the transfer.
The court referenced Section 20 of the Sale of Goods Act, 1930, clarifying that in an unconditional contract for the sale of specific goods (in this case, shares), the title passes once the goods are in a deliverable state, regardless of any issues around payment. Since the shares had been delivered and Form SH-4 executed, the title to the shares legally belonged to Grover.
(b) Final Verdict and Repercussions
The Delhi High Court dismissed Nakrani’s plea, refusing to grant an injunction to rescind the share transfer. The judgment reaffirmed Grover’s ownership of the shares and highlighted the importance of statutory procedures in the transfer of equity. The court's ruling emphasized that once Form SH-4 is executed and reflects the receipt of consideration, it holds significant legal weight, and challenges based on contradictory claims would not be entertained.
This ruling not only resolved the dispute between Nakrani and Grover but also served as a crucial legal precedent for share transfer disputes, particularly within the startup ecosystem.
6. The EOW Case and Fraud Allegations (May 2023)
In May 2023, BharatPe filed an FIR with the Economic Offences Wing (“EOW”) accusing Ashneer Grover, Madhuri Jain Grover, Shwetank Jain (Madhuri’s brother), Suresh Jain (Grover’s father-in-law) and Deepak Gupta (Madhuri’s brother-in-law) of embezzling company funds and engaging in fraudulent transactions between 2019 and 2021. The allegations centred around inflated payments made to non-existent vendors, which were said to total INR 72,00,00,000.
Key legal developments from this investigation included:
Amit Kumar Bansal’s arrest for allegedly being involved in these fraudulent entities.
The arrest of Deepak Gupta for his alleged role in facilitating the fraud.
The EOW investigation played a crucial role in substantiating BharatPe’s claims of financial misappropriation and helped frame the narrative of fraud that the company pursued through legal channels.
7. Settlement and Withdrawal of All Cases (September 2024)
After more than two years of disputes, BharatPe and Grover reached a settlement in September 2024. As part of the settlement:
Both parties agreed to withdraw all ongoing legal cases, including BharatPe’s fraud claims and Nakrani’s share transfer dispute.
Grover agreed to transfer part of his shareholding to the Board, with the remaining placed in a family trust, effectively removing him from BharatPe’s cap table.
BharatPe dropped its INR 81,30,00,000 fraud allegations and related criminal cases, while Grover waived any further claims against the company.
This settlement marked the end of a protracted legal battle, allowing BharatPe to focus on its future without further internal conflict. It also signalled the closure of one of India’s most publicized startup conflicts.
8. Impact on BharatPe and Corporate Governance
The resolution of the dispute allows BharatPe to move forward without the cloud of internal discord, focusing instead on growth and profitability. The case also highlights the importance of corporate governance and adherence to legal formalities, especially when it comes to share transfers and equity ownership.
The BharatPe – Grover saga has been a dramatic chapter in the Indian startup ecosystem. From Grover’s high-profile exit to the legal battle over shares and the eventual settlement, it underscores the complexities of governance and equity management in fast-growing companies. The recent settlement brings closure to a long-standing conflict, allowing both BharatPe and Grover to focus on their future endeavours
Comments